Today, there are more than 3,000 ANT® driven vehicles in operation worldwide. With its 20 years of industry experience, the company provides the autonomous navigation technology (ANT®) and expert support customers need to bring their AGV, automated forklift or mobile robot successfully to market. If in doubt, discuss this question with your automated vehicle partner.īlueBotics is the reference in natural feature navigation and has the mission to help companies meet the challenge of vehicle automation. In tandem with this approach, however, staff must be trained to notice stopped vehicles and remove blockages promptly. Generally speaking, much of the time AMRs and products such as cleaning robots employ obstacle avoidance, while AGVs working in industrial applications are - counterintuitively perhaps - usually most efficient when they use path following. In this scenario, if something blocks a vehicle's route, the AGV or AMR will try to dynamically move around this object, planning an alternate path on the fly while deviating as little as possible from its primary route and returning to this as soon as it can.īoth of these approaches have advantages and disadvantages. This is sometimes referred to simply as 'collision avoidance'.īy contrast, obstacle avoidance is a more fluid, more active approach. When the vehicle reaches an obstacle blocking its path, it simply stops and waits for the blockage to be removed. Path following involves a vehicle following a pre-defined route that can be either a physical line on, or under, the floor or a virtual path. These can be summarised as either 'path following' or 'obstacle avoidance'. When it comes to dealing with obstructions to a vehicle's path, there are two basic modes of operation that AGVs and autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) employ. Many companies use different scanners for different jobs – adding for example a scanner high up on the vehicle for accurate vehicle positioning, and different ankle-height scanners to ensure the safety of the vehicle. If 2D scanners are used, which is usually the case, the only mandatory requirement to ensure the safety of workers is a horizonal scanner positioned to detect obstacles near ground level. For any vehicle that does not move at a very low speed, this means its bumpers will need to be larger and therefore more space will be required for it to manoeuvre. Another option, for example, is physical bumpers - just like on your car - but in order to guarantee a vehicle stops before hitting an obstacle the size of these bumpers must be proportional to the maximum speed a vehicle can reach. A common safety feature used by AGVs is the inclusion of 2D safety laser scanners (based on LiDAR), however these are not mandatory. A loss of safety function can still occur in the case of a synchronous accumulation of faults, which is, however, highly unlikely.Ĭlearly an integral element of safety is the ability to avoid collisions – whether with humans or inanimate objects. Specifically, this level of safety ensures a vehicle will continue to function in the event of a single fault, for example by employing two redundant channels. The industry standard that AGV manufacturers are required to reach is PLd level safety programming. The EN ISO 13849-2015 standard, meanwhile, defines performance levels as running from the lowest level, PLa, to the most stringent, PLe, which is required for different safety components (such as a vehicle's safety laser scanners). For systems that will operate continuously, SIL and PL are both defined as ranges of the probability of dangerous failure per hour and they overlap. A device or system must meet the requirements for both categories to achieve a given SIL. The International Electrotechnical Commission's (IEC) standard IEC 61508 defines SIL using requirements grouped into two broad categories: hardware safety integrity and systematic safety integrity. Both PL and its sister classification, SIL (Safety Integrity Level) are measures of the reduction in risk provided by a safety function of a control system. The system that controls the movements of an AGV is classified as a control system, and so its level of safety is defined by its Performance Level (PL). To guarantee this, there are certain safety rules and AGV safety standards that all AGVs must comply with.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |